|
|
Post by familyof6 on Apr 24, 2013 23:11:45 GMT -5
|
|
vikx
3K Post Member
Posts: 3,556
|
Post by vikx on Apr 25, 2013 1:49:51 GMT -5
I'm thinking not a Shasta... Maybe.
|
|
Hamlet
2K Post Member
Posts: 2,241 
|
Post by Hamlet on Apr 25, 2013 22:18:32 GMT -5
Hamlet agrees, viks, and is thinking that 1954 was a VERY early year, and the earliest Shastas had smooth skin. Too many things just seem not Shasta-like.
|
|
Gone Kayaking
1K Post Member
long live the Vintage Shasta Trailer Forum....we're gone but you are not forgotten!
Posts: 1,600 
|
Post by Gone Kayaking on Apr 25, 2013 22:50:06 GMT -5
agree not a shasta. The smooth skin on the early ones was on the Back and over the top. But front and sides had the 6" break. Double awning windows--not shasta, window in door not shasta. The 54 did not have dinette windows so that's consistent. baggage doors are wrong. Inside layout isn't right either but who knows if he/she was copying original.
|
|
mobiltec
1K Post Member
Restoring The 57 Shasta
Posts: 1,134
|
Post by mobiltec on Apr 25, 2013 23:45:49 GMT -5
Well I'm sure as heck not gonna be the one to tell them. LOL... Learned my lesson last week.
|
|
boandsusan
2K Post Member
Christmas parade 2012
Posts: 2,000
|
Post by boandsusan on Apr 26, 2013 0:20:53 GMT -5
I like though.
|
|
|
|
Post by schweetcruisers on Apr 26, 2013 14:01:55 GMT -5
I think it's worse with Airstreams, everytime I see a no/off brand silver trailer on C/L it's a Airstream! Infact when I first started mine, I would tell people that I am restoring a vintage trailer, and in the same breath I'd have to say " not a Airstream!" I got really fast at saying it because I knew what their next question would be, "is it a Airstream?" To this day my brother still asks me if its a Airstream, even though he's seen it multiple times!
|
|
|
|
Post by 54campin on May 2, 2013 0:36:10 GMT -5
That sure looks exactly like my trailer from the outside.
|
|
